Irrigation Wheat Seed
Yield Data
Natal Yield Data
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||
| BERGVILLE COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2010 TO 2011 | ||||||
| 2010 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK |
| 6.11 | 3 | SST843(PBR) | 6.72 | 4 | 5.49 | 6 |
| 7.14 | 1 | SST806(PBR) | 7.24 | 1 | 7.03 | 1 |
| 5.89 | 5 | CRN826(PBR) | 6.21 | 5 | 5.56 | 5 |
| 6.73 | 2 | SST835(PBR) | 6.74 | 3 | 6.71 | 2 |
| 5.26 | 8 | SST867(PBR) | 4.88 | 9 | 5.63 | 4 |
| 5.03 | 9 | SST866(PBR) | 5.78 | 7 | 4.27 | 9 |
| 5.87 | 6 | SST877(PBR) | 5.55 | 8 | 6.19 | 3 |
| 6.05 | 4 | SST875(PBR) | 6.94 | 2 | 5.16 | 8 |
| 5.66 | 7 | SST884(PBR) | 5.96 | 6 | 5.35 | 7 |
| 5.88 | Average | 6.02 | 5.74 | |||
| 9.55 | CV | 10.16 | 8.82 | |||
| 0.86 | LSD(0,05) | 1.22 | 1.01 | |||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||
| NATAL COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2010 TO 2011 | ||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar |
| 6.11 | 3 | SST843(PBR) |
| 7.14 | 1 | SST806(PBR) |
| 5.89 | 5 | CRN826(PBR) |
| 6.73 | 2 | SST835(PBR) |
| 5.26 | 8 | SST867(PBR) |
| 5.03 | 9 | SST866(PBR) |
| 5.87 | 6 | SST877(PBR) |
| 6.05 | 4 | SST875(PBR) |
| 5.66 | 7 | SST884(PBR) |
| 5.88 | Average | |
| 9.55 | CV | |
| 0.86 | LSD(0,05) | |
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||||
| WINTERTON COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK | 2009 | RANK |
| 6.05 | 8 | SST843(PBR) | 5.62 | 6 | 7.18 | 8 | 5.36 | 6 |
| 7.41 | 1 | SST806(PBR) | 6.99 | 2 | 8.14 | 6 | 7.11 | 2 |
| 6.24 | 7 | CRN826(PBR) | 6.32 | 4 | 8.69 | 4 | 3.72 | 9 |
| 7.16 | 3 | SST835(PBR) | 6.72 | 3 | 9.03 | 3 | 5.72 | 5 |
| 6.78 | 6 | SST867(PBR) | 4.16 | 9 | 9.05 | 2 | 7.14 | 1 |
| 6.89 | 4 | SST866(PBR) | 5.06 | 7 | 10.30 | 1 | 5.30 | 7 |
| 5.44 | 9 | SST877(PBR) | 4.48 | 8 | 6.55 | 9 | 5.30 | 8 |
| 7.33 | 2 | SST875(PBR) | 7.25 | 1 | 8.40 | 5 | 6.34 | 4 |
| 6.88 | 5 | SST884(PBR) | 6.12 | 5 | 7.78 | 7 | 6.73 | 3 |
| 6.53 | Average | 5.35 | 8.41 | 5.83 | ||||
| 7.61 | CV | 11.08 | 6.20 | 5.88 | ||||
| 0.62 | LSD(0,05) | 1.19 | 1.04 | 0.69 | ||||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
Eastern Free state Yield Data
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||
| FRANKFORT COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2011 | ||
| 2011 | RANK | Cultivar |
| 4.27 | 8 | SST843(PBR) |
| 4.35 | 7 | SST806(PBR) |
| 4.56 | 6 | CRN826(PBR) |
| 5.03 | 4 | SST835(PBR) |
| 4.15 | 9 | SST867(PBR) |
| 5.10 | 3 | SST866(PBR) |
| 4.99 | 5 | SST877(PBR) |
| 5.37 | 2 | SST875(PBR) |
| 5.51 | 1 | SST884(PBR) |
| 4.86 | Average | |
| 9.28 | CV | |
| 0.90 | LSD(0,05) | |
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||
| EASTERN FREE STATE COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2010-2011 | ||
| 2010-2011 | RANK | Cultivar |
| 5.36 | 6 | SST843(PBR) |
| 5.62 | 4 | SST806(PBR) |
| 5.33 | 8 | CRN826(PBR) |
| 5.85 | 2 | SST835(PBR) |
| 4.54 | 9 | SST867(PBR) |
| 5.50 | 5 | SST866(PBR) |
| 5.34 | 7 | SST877(PBR) |
| 6.14 | 1 | SST875(PBR) |
| 5.83 | 3 | SST884(PBR) |
| 5.45 | Average | |
| 9.69 | CV | |
| 0.81 | LSD(0,05) | |
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
Northern Areas Yield Data
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||||
| MARBLE HALL COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK | 2009 | RANK |
| 8.05 | 6 | SST843(PBR) | 8.68 | 6 | 8.33 | 5 | 7.14 | 8 |
| 8.05 | 5 | SST806(PBR) | 9.21 | 3 | 7.54 | 8 | 7.41 | 5 |
| 8.42 | 4 | CRN826(PBR) | 8.74 | 4 | 9.11 | 3 | 7.40 | 6 |
| 7.91 | 8 | SST835(PBR) | 8.69 | 5 | 7.74 | 7 | 7.30 | 7 |
| 6.32 | 9 | SST867(PBR) | 6.18 | 9 | 5.99 | 9 | 6.78 | 9 |
| 8.47 | 3 | SST866(PBR) | 6.50 | 8 | 10.68 | 1 | 8.24 | 2 |
| 8.00 | 7 | SST877(PBR) | 8.15 | 7 | 7.82 | 6 | 8.03 | 3 |
| 9.09 | 2 | SST875(PBR) | 9.75 | 2 | 8.74 | 4 | 8.79 | 1 |
| 9.44 | 1 | SST884(PBR) | 10.53 | 1 | 10.01 | 2 | 7.77 | 4 |
| 8.26 | Average | 8.59 | 8.46 | 7.72 | ||||
| 10.81 | CV | 14.99 | 6.06 | 8.85 | ||||
| 1.11 | LSD(0,05) | 2.57 | 1.03 | 1.37 | ||||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||
| NORTHERN IRRIGATION AREAS COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar |
| 7.64 | 8 | SST843(PBR) |
| 8.15 | 5 | SST806(PBR) |
| 8.29 | 4 | CRN826(PBR) |
| 8.13 | 7 | SST835(PBR) |
| 6.54 | 9 | SST867(PBR) |
| 8.67 | 3 | SST866(PBR) |
| 8.14 | 6 | SST877(PBR) |
| 8.82 | 1 | SST875(PBR) |
| 8.68 | 2 | SST884(PBR) |
| 8.26 | Average | |
| 9.45 | CV | |
| 0.55 | LSD(0,05) | |
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||
| NABOOMSPRUIT COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||
| 2010 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK |
| 7.39 | 8 | SST843(PBR) | 6.86 | 9 | 9.24 | 6 |
| 8.13 | 5 | SST806(PBR) | 9.20 | 1 | 9.62 | 5 |
| 8.24 | 4 | CRN826(PBR) | 8.42 | 6 | 10.43 | 2 |
| 8.26 | 3 | SST835(PBR) | 8.64 | 5 | 10.35 | 4 |
| 5.99 | 9 | SST867(PBR) | 7.96 | 8 | 6.42 | 9 |
| 8.77 | 1 | SST866(PBR) | 8.04 | 7 | 10.89 | 1 |
| 7.67 | 7 | SST877(PBR) | 9.02 | 2 | 8.00 | 8 |
| 8.72 | 2 | SST875(PBR) | 8.99 | 3 | 9.06 | 7 |
| 8.09 | 6 | SST884(PBR) | 8.73 | 4 | 10.40 | 3 |
| 8.06 | Average | 8.38 | 9.61 | |||
| 9.82 | CV | 12.16 | 5.86 | |||
| 0.98 | LSD(0,05) | 0.83 | 1.13 | |||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||||
| KOEDOESKOP COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK | 2009 | RANK |
| 7.47 | 8 | SST843(PBR) | 7.39 | 9 | 8.16 | 8 | 6.87 | 8 |
| 8.26 | 5 | SST806(PBR) | 8.54 | 5 | 9.08 | 5 | 7.17 | 7 |
| 8.21 | 7 | CRN826(PBR) | 8.69 | 4 | 8.55 | 7 | 7.38 | 5 |
| 8.22 | 6 | SST835(PBR) | 8.45 | 7 | 8.91 | 6 | 7.29 | 6 |
| 7.30 | 9 | SST867(PBR) | 8.36 | 8 | 6.90 | 9 | 6.65 | 9 |
| 8.76 | 1 | SST866(PBR) | 8.90 | 3 | 9.86 | 1 | 7.53 | 4 |
| 8.75 | 2 | SST877(PBR) | 8.90 | 2 | 9.32 | 3 | 8.02 | 1 |
| 8.66 | 3 | SST875(PBR) | 8.97 | 1 | 9.36 | 2 | 7.64 | 3 |
| 8.52 | 4 | SST884(PBR) | 8.47 | 6 | 9.13 | 4 | 7.97 | 2 |
| 8.45 | Average | 8.47 | 9.25 | 7.63 | ||||
| 7.52 | CV | 9.00 | 5.53 | 7.96 | ||||
| 0.79 | LSD(0,05) | 1.52 | 1.02 | 1.22 | ||||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
Lichtenburg Yield Data
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||||
| LICHTENBURG COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK | 2009 | RANK |
| 9.01 | 7 | SST843(PBR) | 9.33 | 7 | 9.90 | 6 | 7.80 | 9 |
| 9.72 | 5 | SST806(PBR) | 10.28 | 5 | 9.81 | 7 | 9.07 | 3 |
| 9.37 | 6 | CRN826(PBR) | 9.90 | 6 | 9.21 | 8 | 9.00 | 4 |
| 10.30 | 2 | SST835(PBR) | 10.88 | 2 | 10.77 | 4 | 9.26 | 2 |
| 8.69 | 9 | SST867(PBR) | 8.80 | 8 | 8.39 | 9 | 8.87 | 5 |
| 9.96 | 4 | SST866(PBR) | 10.63 | 4 | 10.81 | 3 | 8.45 | 6 |
| 8.92 | 8 | SST877(PBR) | 8.14 | 9 | 10.52 | 5 | 8.09 | 8 |
| 10.85 | 1 | SST875(PBR) | 10.67 | 3 | 12.57 | 1 | 9.31 | 1 |
| 10.05 | 3 | SST884(PBR) | 10.88 | 1 | 10.82 | 2 | 8.44 | 7 |
| 9.75 | Average | 9.93 | 10.42 | 8.89 | ||||
| 7.00 | CV | 10.63 | 3.61 | 4.25 | ||||
| 0.85 | LSD(0,05) | 2.11 | 0.75 | 0.76 | ||||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
Vaalharts Yield Data
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||||
| HARTSVALLEI COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK | 2009 | RANK |
| 7.59 | 9 | SST843(PBR) | 8.97 | 9 | 7.58 | 9 | 6.21 | 3 |
| 9.81 | 1 | SST806(PBR) | 12.29 | 1 | 11.14 | 1 | 5.99 | 5 |
| 8.36 | 5 | CRN826(PBR) | 10.39 | 6 | 9.43 | 5 | 5.26 | 7 |
| 9.47 | 2 | SST835(PBR) | 11.71 | 2 | 11.08 | 2 | 5.63 | 6 |
| 8.74 | 4 | SST867(PBR) | 11.51 | 3 | 9.97 | 4 | 4.74 | 8 |
| 8.00 | 7 | SST866(PBR) | 10.27 | 7 | 7.74 | 8 | 6.00 | 4 |
| 7.76 | 8 | SST877(PBR) | 10.49 | 5 | 8.59 | 7 | 4.21 | 9 |
| 9.22 | 3 | SST875(PBR) | 11.09 | 4 | 10.29 | 3 | 6.29 | 2 |
| 8.35 | 6 | SST884(PBR) | 9.77 | 8 | 8.91 | 6 | 6.36 | 1 |
| 8.62 | Average | 10.64 | 9.42 | 5.79 | ||||
| 7.74 | CV | 7.56 | 6.45 | 9.74 | ||||
| 0.83 | LSD(0,05) | 1.61 | 1.21 | 1.13 | ||||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||
| VAALHARTS COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar |
| 5.90 | 9 | SST843(PBR) |
| 7.62 | 2 | SST806(PBR) |
| 7.26 | 4 | CRN826(PBR) |
| 7.62 | 1 | SST835(PBR) |
| 6.88 | 6 | SST867(PBR) |
| 6.63 | 7 | SST866(PBR) |
| 6.49 | 8 | SST877(PBR) |
| 7.35 | 3 | SST875(PBR) |
| 6.99 | 5 | SST884(PBR) |
| 6.97 | Average | |
| 9.42 | CV | |
| 0.57 | LSD(0,05) | |
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||||
| HARTSWATER COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK | 2009 | RANK |
| 4.21 | 9 | SST843(PBR) | 5.61 | 9 | 3.91 | 9 | 3.12 | 5 |
| 5.43 | 5 | SST806(PBR) | 7.50 | 4 | 6.34 | 3 | 2.46 | 7 |
| 6.17 | 1 | CRN826(PBR) | 7.60 | 3 | 7.58 | 1 | 3.32 | 3 |
| 5.76 | 2 | SST835(PBR) | 7.73 | 1 | 7.23 | 2 | 2.32 | 9 |
| 5.02 | 8 | SST867(PBR) | 7.60 | 2 | 5.08 | 8 | 2.39 | 8 |
| 5.25 | 6 | SST866(PBR) | 6.89 | 7 | 5.46 | 7 | 3.40 | 2 |
| 5.22 | 7 | SST877(PBR) | 6.56 | 8 | 6.18 | 4 | 2.91 | 6 |
| 5.48 | 4 | SST875(PBR) | 7.27 | 5 | 5.88 | 5 | 3.30 | 4 |
| 5.62 | 3 | SST884(PBR) | 7.22 | 6 | 5.51 | 6 | 4.14 | 1 |
| 5.33 | Average | 7.21 | 5.70 | 3.07 | ||||
| 12.14 | CV | 9.91 | 11.92 | 17.29 | ||||
| 0.80 | LSD(0,05) | 1.43 | 1.36 | 1.06 | ||||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
Western Free State
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||||
| HOOPSTAD COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK | 2009 | RANK |
| 6.99 | 8 | SST843(PBR) | 5.63 | 8 | 7.98 | 7 | 7.35 | 9 |
| 8.96 | 2 | SST806(PBR) | 8.16 | 3 | 9.63 | 3 | 9.10 | 3 |
| 8.46 | 4 | CRN826(PBR) | 7.20 | 6 | 8.15 | 6 | 10.03 | 2 |
| 8.77 | 3 | SST835(PBR) | 8.45 | 2 | 9.03 | 5 | 8.82 | 4 |
| 6.80 | 9 | SST867(PBR) | 5.53 | 9 | 7.29 | 9 | 7.58 | 7 |
| 8.45 | 6 | SST866(PBR) | 7.25 | 5 | 10.65 | 2 | 7.45 | 8 |
| 7.88 | 7 | SST877(PBR) | 6.83 | 7 | 9.08 | 4 | 7.74 | 6 |
| 9.14 | 1 | SST875(PBR) | 8.46 | 1 | 10.74 | 1 | 8.22 | 5 |
| 8.45 | 5 | SST884(PBR) | 7.56 | 4 | 7.59 | 8 | 10.19 | 1 |
| 8.28 | Average | 7.29 | 8.94 | 8.60 | ||||
| 8.99 | CV | 12.57 | 6.27 | 8.29 | ||||
| 0.92 | LSD(0,05) | 1.83 | 1.12 | 1.42 | ||||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
Orange River Area
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||||
| DOUGLAS COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK | 2009 | RANK |
| 7.47 | 9 | SST843(PBR) | 8.98 | 9 | 8.31 | 9 | 5.13 | 9 |
| 9.48 | 3 | SST806(PBR) | 11.08 | 6 | 9.50 | 2 | 7.87 | 6 |
| 9.58 | 2 | CRN826(PBR) | 11.09 | 5 | 9.48 | 3 | 8.18 | 3 |
| 8.92 | 7 | SST835(PBR) | 9.80 | 7 | 8.72 | 6 | 8.25 | 2 |
| 8.27 | 8 | SST867(PBR) | 9.50 | 8 | 8.46 | 8 | 6.84 | 7 |
| 9.45 | 4 | SST866(PBR) | 11.40 | 3 | 8.78 | 5 | 8.17 | 4 |
| 9.39 | 5 | SST877(PBR) | 11.54 | 2 | 8.53 | 7 | 8.11 | 5 |
| 10.22 | 1 | SST875(PBR) | 12.27 | 1 | 10.05 | 1 | 8.33 | 1 |
| 9.03 | 6 | SST884(PBR) | 11.25 | 4 | 9.16 | 4 | 6.67 | 8 |
| 9.20 | Average | 10.88 | 8.96 | 7.74 | ||||
| 5.51 | CV | 6.01 | 3.97 | 6.01 | ||||
| 0.63 | LSD(0,05) | 1.31 | 0.71 | 0.93 | ||||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||
| ORANGE RIVER AREAS COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar |
| 7.58 | 9 | SST843(PBR) |
| 8.77 | 5 | SST806(PBR) |
| 8.48 | 7 | CRN826(PBR) |
| 8.48 | 6 | SST835(PBR) |
| 7.84 | 8 | SST867(PBR) |
| 9.15 | 3 | SST866(PBR) |
| 8.99 | 4 | SST877(PBR) |
| 9.19 | 2 | SST875(PBR) |
| 9.27 | 1 | SST884(PBR) |
| 8.71 | Average | |
| 8.25 | CV | |
| 0.51 | LSD(0,05) | |
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||||||||
| PRIESKA COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2009 TO 2011 | ||||||||
| 2009 - 2011 | RANK | Cultivar | 2011 | RANK | 2010 | RANK | 2009 | RANK |
| 8.68 | 8 | SST843(PBR) | 8.56 | 4 | 10.91 | 9 | 6.57 | 6 |
| 8.75 | 7 | SST806(PBR) | 7.76 | 7 | 11.85 | 8 | 6.63 | 5 |
| 9.04 | 5 | CRN826(PBR) | 7.75 | 8 | 12.88 | 4 | 6.48 | 7 |
| 8.91 | 6 | SST835(PBR) | 7.84 | 6 | 12.52 | 5 | 6.37 | 8 |
| 8.16 | 9 | SST867(PBR) | 6.94 | 9 | 12.06 | 7 | 5.48 | 9 |
| 10.16 | 2 | SST866(PBR) | 9.17 | 3 | 14.35 | 1 | 6.95 | 4 |
| 9.87 | 4 | SST877(PBR) | 8.42 | 5 | 13.68 | 3 | 7.52 | 1 |
| 9.95 | 3 | SST875(PBR) | 9.98 | 1 | 12.50 | 6 | 7.37 | 2 |
| 10.20 | 1 | SST884(PBR) | 9.65 | 2 | 13.82 | 2 | 7.14 | 3 |
| 9.44 | Average | 8.70 | 12.72 | 6.90 | ||||
| 7.90 | CV | 11.87 | 5.24 | 5.81 | ||||
| 0.92 | LSD(0,05) | 2.06 | 1.33 | 0.80 | ||||
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||
| IRRIGATION WHEAT YIELD TABLE | ||
| ORANIA COMBINED – AVERAGE TON/HA – 2011 | ||
| 2011 | RANK | Cultivar |
| 8.15 | 9 | SST843(PBR) |
| 11.33 | 2 | SST806(PBR) |
| 8.66 | 8 | CRN826(PBR) |
| 11.51 | 1 | SST835(PBR) |
| 9.43 | 6 | SST867(PBR) |
| 10.28 | 4 | SST866(PBR) |
| 9.55 | 5 | SST877(PBR) |
| 9.38 | 7 | SST875(PBR) |
| 10.83 | 3 | SST884(PBR) |
| 9.83 | Average | |
| 14.00 | CV | |
| 2.75 | LSD(0,05) | |
| No statistical difference between highlighted cultivars in year of review | |||||||